Senate debates
Thursday, 8 February 2024
Bills
Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill 2023; Third Reading
4:20 pm
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The question now is that the remaining stages of the bill be agreed to and the bill be now passed.
4:24 pm
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senators, that concludes consideration of the bill. I would like to thank you for your attention and your cooperation.
An incident having occurred in the gallery—
Order! Order in the gallery! The Senate will now return to the routine of business.
An incident having occurred in the gallery—
I'm going to call the chamber and the gallery to order. Thank you.
Claire Chandler (Tasmania, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Minister for Foreign Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Colbeck?
Richard Colbeck (Tasmania, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
On a point of order to the chair, and the President might like to consider this: when a group of farmers expressed a view and applauded in the chamber earlier in the week, they were threatened with removal. They were threatened with removal. My simple point is, quite frankly, if there's going to be applause from the gallery and stuff like that, that's fine, but I know what the standing orders say. But there should be equal treatment of people within the chamber. So, when a farmer comes here and they're threatened with removal from the chamber for applauding from the gallery, I don't see why it's different to somebody from a trade union who comes here and applauds something from the gallery. I do note that you called them to order, but they weren't threatened with removal from the gallery. I just would ask—a simple request—for equal treatment for people in equal circumstances.
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Thank you, Senator Colbeck, for your comments. What I would say to you is that, in relation to the gallery the other day, I called them to order three times, and it was on the third occasion that I threatened to have them removed. With the current gallery, I called them to order twice, and on the second occasion they came to order. I would like to think that I am very fair and impartial at all times. Certainly, in the gallery the other day, on the third occasion, I threatened to have them removed because as President of this place I should not have to do it three times, whether it's in the chamber or in the gallery. So I thank you for your comments.